While this is an understandable conclusion, it doesn’t take
into account all the facts. For instance, what happens if you outlaw guns? No
matter how hard it tries, the government cannot keep all guns away from
everybody. Even if it could, it would require a huge increase in governmental
power, which is something we most definitely do not need. The result of this is
that all the law-abiding citizens are punished by not being allowed to keep guns
while the criminals still illegally carry guns. We would see a huge increase of gun violence, not a
decrease.
Also, the Constitution CLEARLY states that United States’
citizens have the right to bear arms. Thus, if the national government makes
any move to infringe upon that right, it breaks the highest law of our land. Our
founding fathers were wise men who knew what they were doing when they wrote
the Constitution, putting all their sweat and tears, as well as their Christian
upbringing, political experience, age,
education, and thought into the most important political document that America
has ever seen. It is a very big step to contradict a document that has been the
highest law of the land for over 200 years, when most other countries re-write
their Constitutions every decade or so.
Thus, the government must either append to the Constitution
(a move which should meet with much opposition) amendments clearly against our
founder’s intentions, or press states, which have the ability to set gun
control laws, to pass anti-gun legislation.
I looked up online a few states’ gun control laws. I found
one article that started with the statement that a gun control law had been
struck down that would have affected Washington, D.C. After the law was struck
down, many liberal politicians panicked because they believed that the strike-down
would increase gun violence. The article then captured those same politicians
bewilderment that the gun violence rate went down as a result of the failed
attempt at regulation.
There are thousands of other stories that capture the same
message: gun control does not solve the problem of gun violence! The issues
behind gun violence run much deeper than the actual gun. Saying that the gun is
the problem behind gun violence is like saying that the paint can is the
problem behind graffiti. The problem is the person behind the gun, not the gun
itself.
There is nothing wrong with guns, just as there is nothing
wrong with baseball bats, or cars, or toothbrushes. They are tools that can be
used for good things, but like anything else, can be sinfully misused. Gun
control accomplishes nothing and hurts the country when what the country really
needs is reform in general. The reform this country most needs is spiritual--not
healthcare reform, nor social security reform, nor a balanced budget or any
other worthwhile cause. America needs Christ.
No comments:
Post a Comment